Bailout no, Bankruptcy yes.

Interesting point of Jeffrey A. Miron. Jeffrey A. Miron is senior lecturer in economics at Harvard University. A Libertarian, he was one of 166 academic economists who signed a letter to congressional leaders last week opposing the government bailout plan:

Congress has balked at the Bush administration’s proposed $700 billion bailout of Wall Street. Under this plan, the Treasury would have bought the “troubled assets” of financial institutions in an attempt to avoid economic meltdown.

The fact that government bears such a huge responsibility for the current mess means any response should eliminate the conditions that created this situation in the first place, not attempt to fix bad government with more government.

The obvious alternative to a bailout is letting troubled financial institutions declare bankruptcy. Bankruptcy means that shareholders typically get wiped out and the creditors own the company.

Bankruptcy does not mean the company disappears; it is just owned by someone new (as has occurred with several airlines). Bankruptcy punishes those who took excessive risks while preserving those aspects of a businesses that remain profitable.

complete story here

Leave a Reply

photography | santa rosa bench project | vision board 2008 | couch potato to 5K | rss entries | rss comments
design by eightdegree.com | powered by wordpress | hosted by the fine people of mediatemple

mindplunge.com mediatemple.netMozilla Firefox Wordpress Apple inc.

©1969-2008 Richard Lemon.
All rights reserved. Powered by Running and Determination.